Go Back   CruiseMates Cruise Community and Forums > People > Open Debate

Open Debate The only forum to discuss politics and religion. Please keep it civil.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 02:06 PM
Paul Motter's Avatar
Paul Motter Paul Motter is offline
Administrator
Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: in my office!
Posts: 11,005
Send a message via AIM to Paul Motter
Default Colorado Univ. sees Romney Landslide, has picked correctly last 8 elections

The University of Colorado has a unique prediction model that has correctly picked the winner of the last eight presidential elections.

This year they predict:

Romney: 320 electoral college votes
Obama: 218 electoral college votes


This prediction is based purely upon economic conditions in each of the districts it samples. It was actually done back in August.

Analysis of election factors points to Romney win, University of Colorado study says | University of Colorado Boulder

According to their analysis, President Barack Obama will win 218 votes in the Electoral College, short of the 270 he needs. And though they chiefly focus on the Electoral College, the political scientists predict Romney will win 52.9 percent of the popular vote to Obama’s 47.1 percent, when considering only the two major political parties.

“For the last eight presidential elections, this model has correctly predicted the winner,” said Berry. “The economy has seen some improvement since President Obama took office. What remains to be seen is whether voters will consider the economy in relative or absolute terms. If it’s the former, the president may receive credit for the economy’s trajectory and win a second term. In the latter case, Romney should pick up a number of states Obama won in 2008.”


This suggests a few things:

Polls and the Media suggesting Obama has a lead are flat out wrong, or that this election will be decided on topics other than the economy.

However - it is important to note that this model has been right eight times in a row, and it is predicting a landslide by Romney, so even if it is partially correct it suggests that many "swing" voters could easily go the direction of Romney.

One thing that is well known - polls can be horribly and drastically wrong. That is a fact, especially in close elections. Also, it has been reported that this year the number of people who agree to be polled is only 9% of the people who are approached.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 03:01 PM
zydecocruiser's Avatar
zydecocruiser zydecocruiser is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,881
Default

Good luck with that one.

A model by two professors based on lies, damn lies, and statistics. looks like they are going to have to refine that model a bit to reflect reality.


Obama 348, Romney 190: UAH astrophysicist, who got it right twice before, predicts electoral results

"I think the operative word is disaster if you're a Republican," said Colley on Monday. "I think the operative word is confidence if you're a Democrat."


Obama 348, Romney 190: UAH astrophysicist, who got it right twice before, predicts electoral results | al.com
__________________
------------
My cruise web site
I show you my experiences and leave it up to you to decide if it is for you or not.




Done:

Carnival Horizon Transatlantic

Carnival Splendor Panama Canal

Royal Princess

Vision of the Seas

Carnival Miracle Alaska




Carnival Diamond
Princess Platinum
and more...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 03:29 PM
mehawk's Avatar
mehawk mehawk is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston aka Space City, Texas, USA
Posts: 9,718
Default

Bill, just as your "Ohio" posting is, technically, correct, but has had a fantastic run of good luck.
__________________
Michael


Good people sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

Courage and perserverance have a magical talisman; before which difficulties disappear and obstacles vanish into the air.

Pick your company wisely! Hang around people who are going to help you become all God created you to be.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 03:29 PM
Paul Motter's Avatar
Paul Motter Paul Motter is offline
Administrator
Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: in my office!
Posts: 11,005
Send a message via AIM to Paul Motter
Default

Chances of correctly predicting two polls - 1 in 4 (by sheer guessing)

Chances of correctly predicting eight polls - 1 in 256 (by sheer guessing)

Here is my prediction - the percentage of undecided voters out there is getting up into the teens in many states.

My prediction is that many of them will go into the voting booth and realize no one is looking and think "hey, we already gave this guy four years and nothing's happened, let's try this other guy."

The idea is that the deciding factor will not be policy or the Sandra Fluke vote (who already made up their minds), it will be people who have not really thought a lot about this election ( the undecideds ) realizing they have nothing to lose by trying the new guy.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 03:37 PM
zydecocruiser's Avatar
zydecocruiser zydecocruiser is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,881
Default

Chance of anything is still just lies, damn lies, and statistics.

A write in candidate will be a lost vote for Myth. How many votes will Ron Paul get? Colorado doesn't consider that.

Pledge to Write In Ron Paul in 2012

The republican party has been heavily infiltrated by tea smokers and is broken.
__________________
------------
My cruise web site
I show you my experiences and leave it up to you to decide if it is for you or not.




Done:

Carnival Horizon Transatlantic

Carnival Splendor Panama Canal

Royal Princess

Vision of the Seas

Carnival Miracle Alaska




Carnival Diamond
Princess Platinum
and more...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 03:52 PM
ship2shore's Avatar
ship2shore ship2shore is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bikini Bottom
Posts: 1,001
Default

You must be quite pleased Mr. Motter. Congratulations on your guy winning.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 03:54 PM
richstacy's Avatar
richstacy richstacy is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Denver Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,419
Default

Paul I have a bit more faith in polling than you do -- but I saw one of the CU poly-sci guys on local TV here in Denver today, the day of the 1st debate and he says nothing in their model has changed and they still predict a rather large Romney victory.
__________________
RichStacy
Landlocked in Denver, but cruisin every chance we get.

Polynesia, Carib. '86
Cr. Odyssey, Scandinavia, '91, 30 Day S Pac. 2002
Crystal Harm, Aust., N.Z., '94
Royal Odyssey, AK,'96
Old Cr. Pr. Canal, '97
RCCL, Carib, 1998
Volendam, Car, 2000
Ryndam, 35 day S. Am., Antarctica, '03
Is. Pr., Canal, 2004
Statendam, 34 day China, Japan, AK '06
Cr.Pr., Carib. 08
Eurodam, Atlantic, Med. '10
Golden Princess
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 04:03 PM
richstacy's Avatar
richstacy richstacy is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Denver Colorado, USA
Posts: 1,419
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zydecocruiser View Post
Chance of anything is still just lies, damn lies, and statistics.

A write in candidate will be a lost vote for Myth. How many votes will Ron Paul get? Colorado doesn't consider that.

Pledge to Write In Ron Paul in 2012

The republican party has been heavily infiltrated by tea smokers and is broken.
Hopefully very few will vote for Paul. Any vote for Ron Paul is at best a wasted vote and at worst merely a vote for Obama because it takes a vote from Mitt. I think most folks remember the victory the little creep Ross Perot gave to Clinton and are too smart for another mistake like that!! At least I hope so. And BTW, the CU model does take Paul into account.

What is broken is our country and its economy, thanks to the economic policies of the Obama administration. If you want more freedom, less government and less regulation, then vote for Mitt, forget Paul. He is not a factor.
__________________
RichStacy
Landlocked in Denver, but cruisin every chance we get.

Polynesia, Carib. '86
Cr. Odyssey, Scandinavia, '91, 30 Day S Pac. 2002
Crystal Harm, Aust., N.Z., '94
Royal Odyssey, AK,'96
Old Cr. Pr. Canal, '97
RCCL, Carib, 1998
Volendam, Car, 2000
Ryndam, 35 day S. Am., Antarctica, '03
Is. Pr., Canal, 2004
Statendam, 34 day China, Japan, AK '06
Cr.Pr., Carib. 08
Eurodam, Atlantic, Med. '10
Golden Princess
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old October 3rd, 2012, 04:32 PM
zydecocruiser's Avatar
zydecocruiser zydecocruiser is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,881
Default

The CU model expects everyone to vote for one of two candidates but even they admit they can't predict people's perception. In other words, they are guessing.

Apparently republicans do forget the past because they are making the same stupid mistakes they did 4 years ago.
__________________
------------
My cruise web site
I show you my experiences and leave it up to you to decide if it is for you or not.




Done:

Carnival Horizon Transatlantic

Carnival Splendor Panama Canal

Royal Princess

Vision of the Seas

Carnival Miracle Alaska




Carnival Diamond
Princess Platinum
and more...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old October 5th, 2012, 10:45 AM
Marsdude's Avatar
Marsdude Marsdude is offline
Senior Member
Captain
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 763
Default

The CU analysis is interesting and can not be discounted. Of course it does not predict for sure the outcome of the election, but past results are impressive.

There are a few things that they are not taking into account for this election but I will be interested to see what happens..

BTW, most of us who are politically active have made up our minds by this time. We should not be upset at each other because of this. We are voting because of our political outlooks, not because of the stuff we are hearing on the media.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old October 5th, 2012, 12:45 PM
Paul Motter's Avatar
Paul Motter Paul Motter is offline
Administrator
Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: in my office!
Posts: 11,005
Send a message via AIM to Paul Motter
Default

Marsdude is right - those of us paying attention are voting because he have our own opinions about how things should be run. And I understand that and respect it.

Which is why I have asked repeatedly that people not post taunting posts that refer to the other party as "stupid" or use derogatory names for the candidate.

However, it seems one party in particular thinks it is funny (and probably good tactics) to continually insult people who don't agree with them. I think it is a really bad idea, if you want to convince people to come over to your side, you don't do it by calling them stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old October 8th, 2012, 01:36 AM
Paul Motter's Avatar
Paul Motter Paul Motter is offline
Administrator
Admiral
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: in my office!
Posts: 11,005
Send a message via AIM to Paul Motter
Default

Updated election forecasting model still points to Romney win, University of Colorado study says

October 4, 2012 • Social Sciences
An update to an election forecasting model announced by two University of Colorado professors in August continues to project that Mitt Romney will win the 2012 presidential election.

According to their updated analysis, Romney is projected to receive 330 of the total 538 Electoral College votes. President Barack Obama is expected to receive 208 votes -- down five votes from their initial prediction -- and short of the 270 needed to win.

The new forecast by political science professors Kenneth Bickers of CU-Boulder and Michael Berry of CU Denver is based on more recent economic data than their original Aug. 22 prediction. The model itself did not change.

“We continue to show that the economic conditions favor Romney even though many polls show the president in the lead,” Bickers said. “Other published models point to the same result, but they looked at the national popular vote, while we stress state-level economic data.”

While many election forecast models are based on the popular vote, the model developed by Bickers and Berry is based on the Electoral College and is the only one of its type to include more than one state-level measure of economic conditions. They included economic data from all 50 states and the District of Columbia.

Their original prediction model was one of 13 published in August in PS: Political Science & Politics, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Political Science Association. The journal has published collections of presidential election models every four years since 1996, but this year the models showed the widest split in outcomes, Berry said. Five predicted an Obama win, five forecast a Romney win, and three rated the 2012 race as a toss-up.

The Bickers and Berry model includes both state and national unemployment figures as well as changes in real per capita income, among other factors. The new analysis includes unemployment rates from August rather than May, and changes in per capita income from the end of June rather than March. It is the last update they will release before the election.

Of the 13 battleground states identified in the model, the only one to change in the update was New Mexico -- now seen as a narrow victory for Romney. The model foresees Romney carrying New Mexico, North Carolina, Virginia, Iowa, New Hampshire, Colorado, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, Ohio and Florida. Obama is predicted to win Michigan and Nevada.

In Colorado, which Obama won in 2008, the model predicts that Romney will receive 53.3 percent of the vote to Obama’s 46.7 percent, with only the two major parties considered.

While national polls continue to show the president in the lead, “the president seems to be reaching a ceiling at or below 50 percent in many of these states,” Bickers said. “Polls typically tighten up in October as people start paying attention and there are fewer undecided voters.”

The state-by-state economic data used in their model have been available since 1980. When these data were applied retroactively to each election year, the model correctly classifies all presidential election winners, including the two years when independent candidates ran strongly: 1980 and 1992. It also correctly estimates the outcome in 2000, when Al Gore won the popular vote but George W. Bush won the election through the Electoral College.

In addition to state and national unemployment rates, the authors analyzed changes in personal income from the time of the prior presidential election. Research shows that these two factors affect the major parties differently: Voters hold Democrats more responsible for unemployment rates, while Republicans are held more responsible for fluctuations in personal income.

Accordingly -- and depending largely on which party is in the White House at the time -- each factor can either help or hurt the major parties disproportionately.

In an examination of other factors, the authors found that none of the following had a statistically significant effect on whether a state ultimately went for a particular candidate: The location of a party’s national convention, the home state of the vice president or the partisanship of state governors.

The authors also provided caveats. Their model had an average error rate of five states and 28 Electoral College votes. Factors they said may affect their prediction include the timeframe of the economic data used in the study and that states very close to a 50-50 split may fall in an unexpected direction due to factors not included in the model.

“As scholars and pundits well know, each election has unique elements that could lead one or more states to behave in ways in a particular election that the model is unable to correctly predict,” they wrote.

All 13 election models can be viewed on the PS: Political Science & Politics website at Cambridge Journals Online - PS: Political Science & Politics.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old October 8th, 2012, 05:57 AM
ship2shore's Avatar
ship2shore ship2shore is offline
Senior Member
Admiral
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bikini Bottom
Posts: 1,001
Default

Im starting to think some sort of marine creature should pick our next President. Like they do for the Superbowl.
__________________
-----------------------------------------------------------

Booked: Veendam - Montreal to Boston July 28, 2018
and Norwegian Bliss March 02, 2019

Washee Washee! Happy Happy!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carnival Website not working correctly gamom4 Carnival Cruise Lines 10 April 21st, 2008 09:36 AM
colorado =] lsclaf26 Teen Cruisers 110 January 2nd, 2007 10:18 PM
If You watched the Superbowl, or US Elections (for techies.. Cruise Cynic Chit - Chat for Cruisers 4 February 10th, 2005 01:35 PM
Do I Understand this Correctly? jeleja Ask CruiseMates Staff 9 August 7th, 2004 10:26 PM
UNIV STUDIOS EXPRESS PASS CRAZY8 Ask CruiseMates Staff 1 February 1st, 2004 05:49 AM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

 

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM.
design by: Themes by Design